Understand Difference

Decoding Civil Law: Understanding the Codified Legal System

Introduction to Common Law and Civil Law

When it comes to legal systems, there are two major types: Common Law and Civil Law. These systems have their roots in different histories, and they differ in terms of the way they are applied.

Understanding these systems is crucial in today’s globalized world, where legal disputes can arise even between parties from different countries. In this article, we will explore the definition and history of Common Law and Civil Law, as well as the concept of mixed jurisdictions.

Definition and History of Common Law and Civil Law

Let’s start by defining Common Law and Civil Law. Common Law is a type of legal system that is based on judicial precedent, where judges make decisions on cases based on previous cases with similar facts.

The law is not written down in a single document, but rather evolves over time through the decisions of judges. Common Law is most prevalent in countries with a history of British colonialism, such as the United States, Canada, Australia, and India.

On the other hand, Civil Law is a type of legal system that is based on written laws and codes. The law is codified in a single document, and judges apply these laws as they are written.

Civil Law is most prevalent in countries on the European continent, such as France, Germany, and Italy. The history of Common Law and Civil Law dates back to the Middle Ages.

Common Law had its roots in the legal system of England, which evolved over time as judges made decisions based on previous cases. Civil Law, on the other hand, had its origins in the Roman legal system, which was based on written laws and codes.

Mixed Jurisdictions

There are some jurisdictions that have a mix of Common Law and Civil Law. These are referred to as mixed jurisdictions.

One example of a mixed jurisdiction is Sri Lanka, which has a legal system that is based on both Common Law and Roman-Dutch Law. Another example is Quebec, a province in Canada, which has a legal system that is based on Civil Law, but also incorporates elements of Common Law.

Scotland and South Africa are also considered mixed jurisdictions.

Codification in Common Law

A key feature of Common Law is that it is not codified. This means that the law is developed through judicial decisions rather than being set out in a single piece of legislation.

When a judge makes a decision on a case, that decision becomes a precedent for future cases with similar facts. Over time, these precedents build up to form a body of case law that is used by judges to make decisions.

Judicial Decisions in Common Law

As explained earlier, Common Law is based on judicial precedent. This means that judges have a significant role to play in the development of the law.

When a judge makes a decision on a case, that decision becomes a precedent for future cases. Judges are required to follow these precedents when deciding on cases with similar facts.

This ensures consistency and predictability in the application of the law.

Role of Judges in Common Law

Judges play a crucial role in Common Law. They are responsible for interpreting the law and making decisions on cases.

They are also responsible for creating precedent, which shapes the development of the law over time. As a result, judges in Common Law jurisdictions are often highly respected and have a significant amount of power.

Main Sources of Law in Common Law

The main sources of law in Common Law are judicial precedents and legislation. Judicial precedents, as explained earlier, refer to the decisions made by judges in previous cases.

These precedents are binding on future cases with similar facts. Legislation, on the other hand, refers to laws that are passed by the legislature.

These laws are written down and form part of the law of the land.

Court Practice in Common Law

Common Law jurisdictions follow an adversarial system, where two sides present their arguments to a judge or jury, who then make a decision based on the evidence presented. This is in contrast to Civil Law jurisdictions, which follow an inquisitorial system, where the judge takes a more active role in gathering evidence.

In Common Law jurisdictions, it is up to the parties involved in the case to present their evidence and arguments to the judge or jury.

Conclusion

In this article, we have explored the definition and history of Common Law and Civil Law, as well as the concept of mixed jurisdictions. We have also delved into the key features of Common Law, including codification, judicial precedents, the role of judges, the main sources of law, and court practice.

By understanding the differences between these legal systems, we can better navigate legal disputes and work towards a more just and equitable society. Civil Law: Understanding the Codified Legal System

In our previous discussion, we introduced the concept of Common Law and Civil Law and highlighted their key differences.

In this article, we will take a closer look at Civil Law and its features. Civil Law is a codified legal system that is based on written laws and codes.

In this system, judges play a different role compared to Common Law jurisdictions. We will explore this and other aspects of Civil Law, such as its reliance on the codification, judicial decisions, role of judges, sources of law, and court practice.

Codification in Civil Law

One of the key features of Civil Law is its codification. Civil Law is based on written laws and codes, with legislatures enacting the laws that apply to a particular jurisdiction.

As a result, judges in Civil Law jurisdictions apply these laws in the form they are written. Unlike Common Law, there is no extensive body of judicial decisions in Civil Law.

Therefore, Civil Law relies heavily on the provisions of the applicable code, which outlines the law on various matters and must be interpreted to determine the applicable law to a case.

Judicial Decisions in Civil Law

In Civil Law jurisdictions, the role of judicial decisions is very different from that in Common Law. In Civil Law, judicial decisions are not binding on future cases.

Judges are not obligated to follow decisions made in previous cases, as these are not considered to be binding precedent. Although some Civil Law jurisdictions give considerable weight to judicial decisions, these do not have the binding effect given to common law precedent.

Instead, the judge’s primary role is to apply the provisions of the applicable code to the facts of the case. The jurisdiction’s laws and codes are written by the legislature as a result of careful consideration, which means they must reflect the prevailing social and political values of the community.

These codes are the primary source of interpretation that judges use in their decision-making.

Role of Judges in Civil Law

The role of judges in Civil Law jurisdictions is primarily that of applying the law as written. Judges do not “create” the law in the same way Common Law judges do, but instead play a more passive role.

The judges obligation is to review the provisions of the applicable code to the facts of the case before making a decision. Judges are not obliged to follow legal precedent in making their decision, but they must take into account the opinions of previous judges and the general legal philosophy of the applicable code.

Therefore, a judge has the duty to interpret codes in their entirety, together with related legislative intentions to deliver decisions that are logical, reasonable, and defendable within the framework of the law at the time of judgment.

Main Sources of Law in Civil Law

In Civil Law jurisdictions, the main sources of law are the statutes. Simply put, a statute is a law that has been passed by a legislature and enacted into law.

These laws are usually written in a codes format and focus on specific legal areas such as criminal, procedural, tort, and contract law, among others. Legislative bodies draft laws after considerable discussion and debate, and the codes that form part of the Civil Law system typically contain the most significant legal framework and guidance.

Court Practice in Civil Law

In Civil Law jurisdictions, there is a distinction in how courts are run as compared to Common Law jurisdictions. Civil Law jurisdictions operate an inquisitorial system, which differs from the adversarial system used in Common Law jurisdictions.

In the inquisitorial system, the role of the court is to actively find facts, investigate evidence, and make decisions based on that evidence. In this system, it is up to the judge to ask the relevant questions and lead the proceedings to ensure the proper presentation of all the evidence before them.

The judge can call and examine witnesses, and inquire from parties to clarify any ambiguities that may arise, as a way of getting to the root of the matter. This system aims to reveal the truth as supposed to the adversarial system, which mainly focuses on the ability of each counsel to persuasively argue their case to the judge.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Civil Law can be considered as a uniform legal system built on the foundation of written laws and codes. Its codification simplifies legal interpretation, making it critical to the success of legal systems as a whole.

While there are considerable differences between Common Law and Civil Law, people in both systems have the same objective to provide justice impartially. While the role of judges in Civil Law is more passive, scholars believe that it makes the code more reliable and impartial, ensuring that people with different cultural beliefs and practices can rely on it fairly.

Civil Law is a legal system that is based on written laws and codes, with the judge’s primary role being to apply the applicable code to the facts of the case. Unlike Common Law, Civil Law does not have a binding precedent, and its main source of law is statutes.

Additionally, Civil Law jurisdictions operate an inquisitorial system, which actively finds facts, investigates evidence, and makes decisions based on that evidence. It is important to understand the differences between Common Law and Civil Law to navigate legal issues efficiently in today’s globalized world, where legal disputes can arise between parties from different legal systems.

Understanding these differences can lead to a more just and equitable society, as there is a uniform legal system.

Popular Posts