Understand Difference

Mastering the Art of Cost Accounting: Job Costing vs Contract Costing

One of the most critical aspects of running a successful business is managing the costs associated with production and sales. To do this, companies use a variety of tools and techniques to track their expenses and ensure that they are generating a profit.

Two standard methods of cost accounting used in business are Job Costing and Contract Costing. In this article, we’ll explore these two methods in-depth, highlighting the key differences between them, the advantages and disadvantages, and how they can benefit your business.

1)to Job Costing and Contract Costing:

Job costing and contract costing are two primary methods of cost accounting used in business which allow companies to keep track of costs and expenses associated with production or sales of goods or services. The primary difference between these two methods lies in the focus on the necessary costs that are incurred during the production and sales process.

Job costing is a cost accounting method that compares costs associated with producing a customer’s order or a specific project. A job cost sheet is used for each customer order, which is assigned a unique identifier.

The costs incurred in the production process for that particular job or project are then tracked in that job cost sheet. The money spent on labor, materials, and other expenses is totaled for each job, enabling a business to determine the total cost of the project and the profit earned for that project.

Contract costing, on the other hand, is a method of project costing typically used in the construction industry. The process involves creating a contract to perform a specific project.

The costs associated are identified before the project begins, and a contract is agreed upon for the total cost of the project. The contract will outline the expected costs of labor, materials, and equipment, and the company will be compensated based on the agreement.

Key Difference:

The primary difference between job costing and contract costing lies in the focus of costs associated with production. Job costing is assigned a unique identifier to a specific customer order or project, while contract costing focuses on the costs identified in a contract before activities begin.

Overall, the main advantage of using job costing is its ability to provide detailed information on individual jobs for better decision-making, profit maximization, and control. However, job costing may be time-consuming and burdensome, requiring companies to gather detailed data on each job.

In contrast, contract costing is less information intensive but is used for long-term projects such as home construction. Conclusion:

In conclusion, businesses use various accounting methods to track their expenses and profits coming from production and sales activities, and two of the primary methods are job costing and contract costing.

Job costing is a method for customer orders and projects where costs are assigned specifically to each job. In contrast, contract costing involves creating a contract that outlines the expenses associated with production activities before work activities begin.

These methods have their advantages and disadvantages, meaning businesses must incorporate the appropriate accounting method based on the nature of their operations. 3) Contract Costing:

Contract costing is a costing system used mainly in the construction and engineering industries.

This method is used to determine costs and revenues for production orders, which are usually longer-term than those in a job costing system. The process involves assigning a unique contract number to each long-term order, allowing the company to track and manage costs and revenues of a particular project.

The nature of construction or engineering work is such that each project comes with specific requirements that are unique. Therefore, contract costing in the construction industry has a different essential format.

Once the contract is signed, the project manager typically assigns a unique number to the contract, which will be used to tag costs to that project. The direct costs of the project, including labor, materials, and equipment, are tracked accordingly.

The distinct characteristic of contract costing lies in the percentage of completion method adopted by companies. This method enables enterprises to recognize and record income, supplies, and overhead costs to the appropriate accounting periods.

Essentially, the percentage completion method identifies the state of progress of a project and is essential to determine the revenues earned and the costs incurred at any given point during the production process. The percentage completion method is based on taking into account the expenses incurred to date relative to the overall project cost.

Additionally, the percentage completion method allows companies to estimate the final cost of the project such that they are aware of how much work needs to be done to complete the project. This method helps to manage projects more effectively and ensure that costs are kept within budget.

4) Differences between Job Costing and Contract Costing:

In the business world, it is essential to determine the costs of the products or services offered to make informed decisions on pricing and increasing profits. Two techniques that are employed to achieve this are job costing and contract costing.

Although there may be similarities between them, there are several significant differences.

Area of Work:

Job costing is most commonly used for small scale projects, while contract costing is usually used for significant scale orders.

Contract costing is predominantly associated with long-term contracts for the construction industry, given the nature of that industry, while job costing is appropriate for smaller orders often fulfilled within a company’s premises.

Time Period and Place of Work:

Another critical difference between job costing and contract costing is the period to which the costing refers.

A job can be completed within one day or several, while contractors’ jobs can run for months or years, even decades. As such, contract accounting involves significant time duration, while job costing is restricted to shorter periods.

Additionally, job costing involves work carried out entirely within the company’s premises, while contract costing often involves working on a site subject to weather challenges and site conditions thus making it quite challenging. Transfer of Profit:

Another significant difference between the two methods is the transfer of profits upon completion of projects.

With job costing, products are considered finished after each job is completed. In contrast, contract costing considers a project complete as a percentage has been achieved.

This means that with contract costing, profit transfer has to be proportional to the work progress, while job costing does not require the same setup.

Conclusion:

Overall, while there are similarities between job costing and contract costing, they each have distinct characteristics and are appropriate in different circumstances.

Job costing is suitable for small scale projects, completed within a short period and carried out entirely in-house. In contrast, contract costing is best used for long-term construction projects, often carried out on site, and the percentage completion method is used to determine costs and revenues.

Regardless of the method used, understanding the costs incurred is vital to maximizing profits and staying competitive in today’s business environment. 5) Conclusion:

In conclusion, it is evident that cost accounting systems are crucial in the efficient allocation and management of production costs in any business.

The two primary cost accounting systems discussed in this article are job costing and contract costing. These systems help businesses to determine the exact costs of producing goods or services, what drives these costs, and how to better allocate these costs efficiently.

The primary objective of cost accounting systems is to monitor and control the costs associated with production, leading to a more efficient use of resources, better pricing, and ultimately, higher profits. With job costing, the costs associated with producing unique customer orders are tracked, enabling businesses to determine the total cost and how much profit was earned from each job.

Contract costing, on the other hand, tracks the costs associated with long-term projects, often in the construction and engineering industry, and records progress as a percentage of completion. In addition to determining costs, these systems allow companies to make informed decisions regarding pricing, ordering inventory, and budgeting.

This information helps businesses make adjustments to their processes, pricing models and become more efficient at cost management. In summary, both job costing and contract costing provide vital financial information to businesses that enable them to determine the specific costs of production and allocate resources efficiently.

These systems are necessary to ensure that businesses make the right decisions when pricing goods or services and to keep operational costs under control. When implemented appropriately, cost accounting systems can be powerful tools to achieve a business’s financial goals and objectives.

In conclusion, this article has covered two primary methods of cost accounting- job costing and contract costing. The purpose of these cost accounting methods is to allocate production costs efficiently and make informed decisions about pricing goods and services while keeping operational costs under control.

The primary objective of cost accounting systems is to monitor and control the costs associated with production, leading to a more efficient use of resources and ultimately higher profits. Businesses need to keep a comprehensive record of costs incurred in the production process, and with the right cost accounting system in place, they can make the right decisions regarding pricing, ordering inventory, and budgeting.

Cost accounting systems are an essential tool in ensuring businesses achieve their financial goals and stay competitive in today’s business environment.

Popular Posts